Objectives
Australian Drug Law Reform
Foundation Objectives:
Preamble
Given that the members of the Australian Drug
Law Reform Foundation recognise:
* the massive size and escalation of the illicit
drug trade and the resulting prevalence and power of organised
crime;
* national and international policies of prohibition have failed
to suppress illicit drug supply notwithstanding enormous financial
and legal resources expended in their implementation;
* current policies have led to an escalation of crimes against
property and associated crimes of violence;
* prohibition is a greater threat to personal and community
health than a system of controlled availability;
* civil liberties are being eroded in attempts to stem the supply
of illicit drugs;
* the fact that drug use will continue in our society;
* potential profits and pyramid supply structure in illicit
drug dealing lead to active recruitment of new drug users and
active introduction of new products to existing users;
* prohibition increases the burden on the criminal justice system;
and
* prohibition promotes corruption;
The Foundation aims to promote:
* The unequivocal opposition to policies of prohibition
with regards to illicit drugs of dependence and psychotropic
substances;
* the nation-wide adoption of drug policies based on harm minimisation
strategies;
* the acceptance of responsibility to reform drug laws, policies
and programs; and
* the establishment of policies that will control production,
manufacture and distribution of drugs of dependence and psychotropic
substances.
Urgent Reforms
The Australian Drug Law Reform Foundation recognises
that:
* Australia has current obligations under International
Treaties;
* there is no approach to the use of drugs of dependence and
psychotropic substances which will ever provide a drug free
community;
* some measure of success has already been achieved through
adoption of policies which give priority to the minimisation
of harm;
* there is some positive overseas experience of new approaches
to drug law which can provide useful models for Australian reform.
Therefore, the primary objectives of the Australian
Drug Law Reform Foundation are:
* the urgent adoption of drug policies based
on strategies of harm minimisation throughout Australia;
* the establishment and legalisation of readily accessible needle
exchange and distribution programs throughout Australia;
* the introduction and maintenance of broad based methadone
programs for all heroin users seeking this type of assistance;
* the expansion of drug rehabilitation programs in range and
number to provide access and choice;
* the provision of politically independent finance and support
for properly conducted scientific studies into the treatment
of drug users, or the use and misuse of drugs of dependence
and psychotropic substances, including alcohol and tobacco;
and
* the development of educational programs based on self reliance
and sound scientific research.
Short Term Goals
The immediate objectives of the Australian Drug
Law Reform Foundation are:
* to seek to increase the focus of a National
drugs strategy on the reduction of harm associated with drug
use;
* to seek the abolition of criminal sanctions for the personal
use of drugs of dependence and psychotropic substances throughout
Australia;
* to seek the adoption, on a national basis, of the South Australian
and Australian Capital Territory expiation notice model for
the reform of laws regarding the personal use and cultivation
of marijuana;
* to seek the adoption of appropriate medical uses of marijuana
and heroin throughout Australia; and
* to seek the adoption, throughout Australia, of a medical model
including consultation and prescription, for the distribution
of selected illicit drugs.
Long Term Goals
The long term objective of the Australian Drug
Law Reform Foundation is to seek a national commitment to undermine
the black market and illicit trade in drugs of dependence and
psychotropic substances, with its inherent problems, by adopting
the following long term goals:
* the reassessment of Australia's commitment
to its International Treaties on illicit drugs and psychotropic
substances;
* independent cost-benefit analysis of all policies which seek
to resolve the problems of dependence and substance misuse;
* the reform of drug laws in planned stages with detailed evaluation
of such laws at all stages; and
* the minimisation of the harmful use of drugs.
DrugSense Mission Statement
Goals and Objectives
DrugSense and its largest project MAP combine to form a 501
c3 non-profit corporation. We exist to provide accurate information
relevant to drug policy in order to heighten awareness of the
extreme damage being caused to our nation and the world by our
current flawed and failed "War on Drugs." We aim to
inform the public of the existence of rational alternatives
to the drug war, and to help organize citizens to bring about
needed reforms.
To further those objectives, and in recognition of the critical
role played by the media and the public, we:
* Call attention to factual errors and excesses of policy
as reported by the working press and broadcast news organizations.
* Promote debate and discussion by encouraging citizens to communicate
their views directly to the media and the public.
* Provide on-line and technical support for a wide range of
reform organizations, large and small, including but not limited
to providing free email chat lists, news information feeds,
and web site creation and support. See our site map for a list
of the organizations we support.
* Create and maintain a growing, easily searched, library of
news and opinion as a research and educational tool.
We believe that public policy has nothing to fear from the
truth. Effective policies require a clear understanding of their
results.
We believe that prohibition is a system which unleashes powerful
forces, most notably the illegal drug markets, that inevitably
make the underlying drug problem worse while adding a series
of costly unintended side effects, including damage to the very
values upon which free nations have been founded.
We believe that a public well informed about the death, disease
and social blight produced by current US drug policy must inevitably
seek to reform it.
LEAP's Mission Statement
Founded on March 16, 2002, LEAP is made up of current and
former members of law enforcement who believe the existing drug
policies have failed in their intended goals of addressing the
problems of crime, drug abuse, addiction, juvenile drug use,
stopping the flow of illegal drugs into this country and the
internal sale and use of illegal drugs. By fighting a war on
drugs the government has increased the problems of society and
made them far worse. A system of regulation rather than prohibition
is a less harmful, more ethical and a more effective public
policy.
The mission of LEAP is to reduce the multitude of unintended
harmful consequences resulting from fighting the war on drugs
and to lessen the incidence of death, disease, crime, and addiction
by ultimately ending drug prohibition.
LEAP's goals are:
1. To educate the public, the media, and policy makers, to
the failure of current drug policy by presenting a true picture
of the history, causes and effects of drug abuse and the crimes
related to drug prohibition and
2. To restore the public's respect for law enforcement, which
has been greatly diminished by its involvement in imposing drug
prohibition.
LEAP's main strategy for accomplishing these goals is to create
a constantly enlarging speakers bureau staffed with knowledgeable
and articulate former drug-warriors who describe the impact
of current drug policies on: police/community relations; the
safety of law enforcement officers and suspects; police corruption
and misconduct; and the financial and human costs associated
with current drug policies.
NORML Mission Statement
NORML's mission is to move public opinion sufficiently to achieve
the repeal of marijuana prohibition so that the responsible
use of cannabis by adults is no longer subject to penalty.
Adopted by the NORML Board of Directors, February 27, 1999
DRCNet Mission Statement
Stop the Drug War (DRCNet) calls for an end to drug prohibition
(e.g. some form of legalization) worldwide and its replacement
with a sensible regime of control through regulation. In the
interim, DRCNet supports philosophically compatible policy reforms
and programs to reduce the excesses of the drug war and its
attendant harms.
DRCNet works for these objectives through a range of educational
programs that are global in their impact; through lobbying efforts
focused primarily on the US; through a philosophy of providing
support infused within all our programs to our allies in the
cause; and to some degree with programs that seek directly to
reduce the harms of current policies and of addiction, which
indirectly serve our educational and advocacy efforts. Read
about our programs here.
We oppose the disorder and violence of the illegal drug trade,
the injustice of mass incarceration of hundreds of thousands
of nonviolent offenders, the spread of deadly epidemic diseases
that is fostered by current drug policies, the denial of needed
medicines to pain patients and others, the dilution of Constitutional
protections and basic freedoms, and the disparate treatment
by race and class that plagues drug enforcement. Current policies
of punitive prohibition place illegal drugs and drug markets
outside of the law, therefore beyond society’s control
and ability to mitigate harm.
We believe that legalization will reduce violence by bringing
the currently uncontrolled markets in illegal drugs within the
law, while reestablishing popular respect for our legal institutions,
reversing the ongoing corruption of law enforcement and the
political system, restoring liberty, privacy and due process,
and securing the public health and welfare. DRCNet therefore
calls for a public dialogue on the full range of alternatives
to current policy, and for implementation of peaceful, public-health
based approaches for reducing the suffering caused by drugs,
and the drug war, to individuals and society as a whole.
Drug Policy Forum - Florida Mission:
DPF Florida members believe that drug related problems threaten
our children's future and weaken our entire nation. We promote
scientific and truthful evaluation of current and proposed policies
aimed at controlling traffic in all types of drugs.
Drug prohibition has cost hundreds of billions of local, state
and federal tax dollars, while clogging courts and severely
encroaching on everyone's freedom. Prohibition also creates
profits that fuel organized crime, corruption, and gang warfare,
while actually increasing children's access to drugs.
Politicians have long insisted that success is just around
the corner and they promise to solve the drug problem if they
have more money and more power, but drug abuse is higher now
than it was 35 years ago.
DPF Florida urges reconsidering laws that were based on fear
and misinformation. We ask our government to discuss more effective
policies that increase our children's safety while protecting
our rights and meeting public health needs.
Hemp Embassy (This
Section Under Construction)
Rationale:
* Prohibitionists have assumed laws can control
drug consumption, but few if any cultures can be forced or persuaded
to be drug free. Some would contend that it is because of prohibition
that drug use in the modern world has escalated in the way that
it has. Effect has been the opposite of intent.
* The limits of legislation must be recognised.
Laws do not always have the intended effect, and when this occurs
the law/s concerned need to be reconsidered.
* Divided societies have more problems. How many
fault lines does society need? Is active discrimination against
cannabis users justified by any benefits?
We feel that cannabis users are the meat in the drug sandwich,
disproportionately targeted by police, and often ripped off
by dealers who are addicted to other drugs. Our drug of choice
has a distinctive smell and is bulky. Unlike powders it is not
often fully consumed at point of sale. The cannabis user is
an easy target to boost arrest rates. Cannabis offenders are
thus over-represented in prison populations. In what way is
this useful?
Given the inoffensive nature of the average cannabis consumer,
it seems irrational to expend large sums persecuting them for
that vice alone.
As a first experimental step in the retreat from the War on
Drugs, we would suggest a regulated legalisation of cannabis
use and supply.
The 1998 Kofi Annan Letter -
http://www.drugpolicy.org/global/ungass/letter/
Appearing in the New York Times in 1998, this letter was
signed by over 500 prominent academics, scientists and political
leaders. It stated that:
"Persisting in our current policies will only result in
more drug abuse, more empowerment of drug markets and criminals,
and more disease and suffering. Too often those who call for
open debate, rigorous analysis of current policies, and serious
consideration of alternatives are accused of "surrendering."
But the true surrender is when fear and inertia combine to shut
off debate, suppress critical analysis, and dismiss all alternatives
to current policies. Mr. Secretary General, we appeal to you
to initiate a truly open and honest dialogue regarding the future
of global drug control policies - one in which fear, prejudice
and punitive prohibitions yield to common sense, science, public
health and human rights".